始於2008  原始點差  不加佣金。
十七年信譽保障
零起付:0.01美元返佣也可以支付到賬。
隨時付:隨時提現,無週期或次數限制。
免費付:不扣任何手續費,全額到賬。
2016-03-22 19:17:17
通貨膨脹的概念很好解釋,但價格的上漲卻極難預測。首先,統計員要搞清人們買了什麼東西,購買的比例是多少(一籃子商品)。他們必須連續追蹤這些產品的價格變化。最後,他們必須對新產品、口味變化及價格上漲做出解釋。
大數據會讓這一切變得簡單。當前的美國消費者物價指數需要派遣工作人員到各個店鋪去記錄價格。這個籃子是基於消費者的調查,該數據每三天更新一次。這種方法與網購相比笨拙許多。從理論上講,在線籃子和物價可以直接追蹤數據。
美國技術公司奧多比正在嘗試這一方法。公司從其客戶浏覽的網站中收集匿名的購買數據,美國500強零售商在線銷量的四分之三都在統計之中。奧多比意圖通過這龐大的信息數據來計算“在線物價指數”(DPI),從而同官方的通脹數據競争。
與傳統方式相比,DPI有很多優點。DPI可以追蹤140萬種產品,而CPI只能追蹤8萬個。DPI追蹤的是實際成交價格,而不是商場的廣告價格,因此準確度更高。各國的經濟學家們也可以從大量的數據中推斷出價格變化對消費者購買意向的影響。
DPI指數完全不含線下價格以及汽油、租金等消費的價格,因此不可能取代CPI指數。但也表明了官方數據確實可能錯過一些暴漲和暴跌的情況,尤其是在科技領域。研究人員發現,在DPI指數中,電腦的價格在今年一月下跌了13.1%,接近CPI數據的兩倍,電視價格的跌幅也大於CPI數據。差距甚大的原因可能是技術更新的速度太快了。調查人員發現,80%的技術產品消費是購買新產品,而DPI指數能更靈敏地捕捉到數據的變化。
如果這種現象普遍存在,那麼實際的通脹水平將低於官方數據。各國央行、借款人、節儉的人以及任何購買長期合約的投資者都要對此提高警惕。這也意味著GDP被低估了。如果整體消費水平是準確的,而通脹水平被高估,那麼實際產出會高於預期水平。
官方的統計員也在完善他們的調查方式。CPI指數現在也涵蓋了檢索網站自動生成的數據。但若不盡早地對大數據加以重視,官方數據將迎來極其強大的競争對手。
Big data provide new ways to gauge price rises
INFLATION is a simple concept, but price rises are surprisingly hard to measure. First, statisticians must work out what stuff people buy, and in what proportions (the “basket” of goods). Then they must track the prices of those goods over time. Finally they must decide how to account for new products, changing tastes and the fact that if the price of, say, apples rises, some people will buy another fruit instead rather than pay more.
Big data could make all of this easier. At the moment, calculating America’s consumer-price index (CPI) involves sending people into shops to note down prices. The basket is based on a survey of consumers which is updated only every three years or so. This looks increasingly cumbersome in a world where every online purchase is logged, somewhere, in a database. In theory online baskets and prices, at least, could be tracked digitally.
Adobe, a technology firm, is trying to do just that. The firm collects anonymised sales data from websites that use its software. The amount of data available is vast: according to the firm, it includes three-quarters of online spending at America’s top 500 retailers. It is using this ocean of information to compile a “digital price index” (DPI) to rival official measures of inflation. Two economists, Pete Klenow of Stanford University and Austan Goolsbee of the University of Chicago, are helping the firm to crunch the numbers.
The DPI has several advantages over the conventional approach. It tracks 1.4m goods, compared with the CPI’s 80,000. It is based on actual purchases rather than advertised prices, increasing its accuracy. And the volume of data allows Messrs Klenow and Goolsbee to use fancier statistical methods to account for people changing what they buy as prices move.
The new index completely misses changes in offline prices and spending on things like petrol and rent. It will not replace the CPI any time soon. It does suggest, however, that official statistics may themselves be missing big price movements, especially for consumer technology. The researchers found that the price of computers fell by 13.1% in the year to January, almost double the 7.1% fall recorded in the CPI. Televisions fell more in price than the CPI reports, too. The speed of innovation in technology might account for the difference. The researchers found that fully 80% of technology spending is on new products, which the more nimble DPI can incorporate quickly.
If this is a widespread phenomenon, and inflation is lower than officially recorded, that has implications for central bankers, borrowers, savers and anyone who strikes long-term contracts. It also means that GDP might be understated, says Mr Klenow. If overall spending is recorded accurately but inflation is exaggerated, output must be higher than thought.
Official statisticians are improving their methods. The CPI includes some prices that are collected automatically by “scraping” websites(something Britain’s statisticians are also experimenting with). But if their take-up of big data is sluggish, official statistics could eventually face disruptive private-sector competition.
本文翻譯由兄弟財經提供
文章來源:http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21695097-big-data-provide-new-ways-gauge-price-rises-how-much-doggy
兄弟財經是全球歷史最悠久,信譽最好的外匯返佣代理。多年來兄弟財經兢兢業業,穩定發展,獲得了全球各地投資者的青睞與信任。歷經十餘年的積澱,打造了我們在業内良好的品牌信譽。
本文所含内容及觀點僅為一般信息,並無任何意圖被視為買賣任何貨幣或差價合約的建議或請求。文中所含内容及觀點均可能在不被通知的情況下更改。本文並未考 慮任何特定用戶的特定投資目標、財務狀況和需求。任何引用歷史價格波動或價位水平的信息均基於我們的分析,並不表示或證明此類波動或價位水平有可能在未來 重新發生。本文所載信息之來源雖被認為可靠,但作者不保證它的準確性和完整性,同時作者也不對任何可能因參考本文内容及觀點而產生的任何直接或間接的損失承擔責任。
外匯和其他產品保證金交易存在高風險,不適合所有投資者。虧損可能超出您的賬戶註資。增大槓桿意味著增加風險。在決定交易外匯之前,您需仔細考慮您的財務目標、經驗水平和風險承受能力。文中所含任何意見、新聞、研究、分析、報價或其他信息等都僅 作與本文所含主題相關的一般類信息.
同時, 兄弟財經不提供任何投資、法律或稅務的建議。您需向合適的顧問徵詢所有關於投資、法律或稅務方面的事宜。
《通向財務自由之路》的作者範K·撒普博士指出:交易成本是影響交易績效的重要因素之一。很少有交易系統可以創造比它的成本更高的利潤。通過外匯返佣代理開戶,可以大幅有效的降低交易成本,從而提升獲利潛能、改善交易績效。
風險提示:
金融產品保證金交易存在極高的風險,未必適合所有的投資者,請不要相信任何高額投資收益的誘導而貿然投資! 在您決定投資槓桿類金融產品時,請務必考慮您的經驗水平和風險承受能力,投資導致的損失有可能超過存入的資金,因此您不應該以不能承受損失的資金來投資!投資風險不僅來自於槓桿交易,也有可能來自於交易商, 請仔細甄選合規的交易商以規避風險!所有投資者的交易帳戶應僅限本人使用,不應交予第三方操作,任何由接受第三方喊單、操盤等服務而導致的風險和虧損應自己承擔,責任自負!
兄弟財經是一間獨立的咨詢服務公司,不隸屬於任何交易商,僅向投資者提供信息咨詢、降低投資成本的咨詢類服務。 兄弟財經不邀約客戶投資任何槓桿類的金融產品,不接觸投資者資金及賬戶信息,不提供交易建議,不提供操盤服務,不推薦交易商, 投資者自行選擇交易商,兄弟財經僅提供信息咨詢,交易商的任何行為均與兄弟財經無關!
投資者在兄弟財經進行任何咨詢行為均代表接受和認可上述聲明!
所有投資者均為自行選擇且直接前往交易商官網進行投資行為(包括提交開戶資料和存取資金),兄弟財經不承擔客戶與交易商之間的交易争議及由交易商問題造成經濟損失的責任。 如果您不了解槓桿類金融產品市場的風險,請千萬不要參與相關投資交易!
請確保您具備以下條件:專業級的投資知識與能力;可以承受損失的資本(虧損不會導致負債或影響生活)。否則切勿參與槓桿交易。